Dhami Fitness

How Often Should You Train a Muscle for Maximum Growth?

One of the most overlooked factors in designing a workout program is training frequency—how often each muscle group is trained per week. While exercise selection, intensity, and volume often dominate conversations around muscle growth, training frequency plays a crucial role in maximizing progress, particularly through its effect on muscle protein synthesis (MPS).

In this article, we’ll explore what the science says about MPS, how long it remains elevated after training, and how frequently you should train a muscle group to optimize hypertrophy.


What is Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS)?

Muscle protein synthesis refers to the biological process through which cells build new proteins, primarily in response to resistance training and nutrient intake (especially protein). This process is central to muscle repair and growth.

After a workout, the body enters a state where MPS rates exceed muscle protein breakdown (MPB), resulting in a net positive protein balance that supports muscle growth. However, this anabolic state is temporary and varies based on an individual’s training history.

  • In untrained individuals, MPS can remain elevated for up to 48 hours post-exercise.
  • In trained individuals, MPS typically peaks around 24 hours and returns to baseline within 36–48 hours.

This timing indicates a limited window for growth stimulation following each training session.


Why Training Frequency Matters

If a muscle group is trained only once per week, that group may experience elevated MPS for just one or two days, followed by 5–6 days of inactivity. During this period, the muscle is not in an anabolic state, and progress can be suboptimal.

Training each muscle group more frequently allows for repeated stimulation of MPS, thereby maintaining a more consistent anabolic environment conducive to muscle growth.


What the Research Shows

1. Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews

A 2016 meta-analysis by Schoenfeld et al., published in Sports Medicine, concluded that training each muscle group twice per week resulted in significantly greater hypertrophy compared to once-weekly training.

A 2019 meta-analysis further supported this by showing that while training frequency alone may not independently enhance hypertrophy if total weekly volume is matched, distributing volume across more sessions can improve session quality, reduce fatigue, and support better recovery.

2. Practical Findings

  • Trained individuals recover faster from resistance training and may benefit from higher training frequency.
  • Two to three training sessions per muscle group per week are often recommended for both trained and untrained populations to maximize hypertrophy.

Is More Always Better?

Training a muscle more than three times per week can yield results if volume is appropriately managed and recovery is prioritized. High-frequency training programs, such as full-body routines 4–6 days per week, have shown success in athletes and advanced trainees.

However, for most individuals, increasing frequency beyond three times per week offers diminishing returns and increases the risk of overtraining if not carefully programmed.


Recommended Frequency Based on Experience Level

Beginners:

  • Full-body workouts 3 times per week, training each muscle group 3 times per week.

Intermediate Lifters:

  • Upper/lower splits or push/pull/legs splits, training each muscle group 2 times per week.

Advanced Lifters:

  • Customized routines based on goals and recovery capacity. Aim for 2–3 times per week per muscle group.

Key Takeaways

  • MPS peaks within 24 hours post-training and returns to baseline within 36–48 hours.
  • Training each muscle group 2–3 times per week is optimal for most lifters.
  • Volume and recovery must be carefully managed, especially when increasing frequency.
  • Scientific literature supports higher training frequency for maximizing hypertrophy.

A well-structured training program that balances frequency, intensity, volume, and recovery is essential for long-term progress. Rather than simply increasing training frequency, aim to optimize all training variables for your current level and goals.


📚 References

  1. Schoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2016).
    Effects of resistance training frequency on measures of muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1689–1697.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8
  2. Schoenfeld, B. J., Grgic, J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2019).
    Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(Suppl 1), S1–S16.
    https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002958
  3. MacDougall, J. D., Gibala, M. J., Tarnopolsky, M. A., MacDonald, J. R., Interisano, S. A., & Yarasheski, K. E. (1995).
    The time course for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise.
    Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 20(4), 480–486.
    https://doi.org/10.1139/h95-038
  4. Damas, F., Phillips, S. M., Libardi, C. A., Vechin, F. C., Lixandrão, M. E., Jannig, P. R., … & Ugrinowitsch, C. (2016).
    Resistance training-induced changes in integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis are related to hypertrophy only after attenuation of muscle damage.
    The Journal of Physiology, 594(18), 5209–5222.
    https://doi.org/10.1113/JP272472
  5. Grgic, J., Schoenfeld, B. J., Orazem, J., & Sabol, F. (2018).
    Effects of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1207–1220.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x

Categories

Sign up for blog updates!

Join my email list to receive updates and information.

Recent Posts

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop