Which is better for weight loss- A low carb or low-fat diet? Some people believe that a low-carb diet is best for fat loss as it depletes glycogen stores in our body, whereas others think that a low-fat diet is superior for weight loss because it is easy for our body to store fat if our diet is high in dietary fats. Several studies have been conducted on this topic to determine which diet is more suitable for weight loss. Let’s see what science has to say about this-
Before moving into the research studies, it is crucial to understand a low-carb or low-fat diet. There is no clear-cut definition of either of these diet types, but it is generally considered that a diet consisting of 50-100 grams of carbs is a low-carb diet, and a diet in which less than 20% of calories are coming from fats is known as the low-fat diet. A very low-carb diet is also known as a ketogenic diet. Let’s look at some of the research studies covering low-fat and low-carb diets-
- A 2003 study published in the New Zealand Journal of Medicine found that the low-carb group lost 7 % of their total body weight, and the fat group lost only 3% after 6 months. However, after 6 months, the weight loss between both groups was almost identical. This study was conducted on 63 obese adults for 12 months. No doubt, this study proved that a low-carb diet is superior in the early phase of the weight loss journey (up to 6 months), but it produces the same result as the low-fat diet in the long term.
- A recent year-long study conducted on 75 people, out of which only 9 were men, also found that weight loss was higher in the low-carb group in the first 6 months, but at the 12 months mark, both low-carb and low-fat group lost almost a similar amount of weight. In this study, the low-carb group was told to have no more than 40 grams of carbs a day, and the low-fat group had less than 30% of their daily calories from fats, and their total calorie intake was 2000 calories per day. Ultimately, this trial failed because it did not go according to the design. As there was no direct control over participants’ food intake, the group supposed to take 40 grams of carbs took 93 grams of carbs on an average per day at six months in. So, it is impossible to make any conclusion from this study.
- A randomized control trial was conducted on 609 participants, of which 263 were males and 346 were premenopausal females. All the participants had no health conditions like diabetes or cancer. Cholesterol, etc., and their average age was 40 years. All the participants were divided into two groups- the low-fat group and the low-carb group. For the first 2 months, the low-fat group was instructed to take only 20g of fat per day, and the low-carb group had only 20g of carbs per day. Remember, after 3 months, there was no control over their macronutrient intake. For example, the low-fat group had more than 42g of fat, and the low-carb group took, on average, 96 g of carb per day. Participants were given no instruction on how many calories they needed to take a day. Still, they were instructed to maximize their fruits and vegetables and minimize their processed food intake. The significant findings of this study are as follows-
- The study found no significant weight loss difference between the low-fat and low-carb groups. The low-carb group had lost 13.2 lbs, and the low-fat group 11.7 lbs after 12 months.
- This study concluded that weight loss results from calorie restriction and mindful eating. Neither a low-carb nor low-fat diet is superior for weight loss as long as your daily calorie intake is controlled.
4. A 6 weeks study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that the Low carb group lost 6.2kg, whereas the low-fat group lost 6 kg of body weight after 6 weeks. The weight difference between both groups was not significant. This study was conducted on 32 adults with obesity.
5. Another study conducted in 2012 by Guldbrand H and his team also showed that low-fat and low carb lost weight over time, but the weight difference was not significant as found in other studies. In this study, the Low carb group lost 6.8 lbs, and the low-fat group lost 7.9 lbs. It was conducted on 61 individuals with type-2 diabetes.
Conclusion
We have to understand that there is no “best diet.” One famous quote is, “If you can not follow a diet for life, then you are only on an adventure.” You should follow only a sustainable diet, and you can easily stick to it. Both low-carb and low-fat diets can help you lose weight; it is up to you which one you want to follow. If your goal is weight loss, my advice would be to divide your macronutrients in this ratio-
Protein Intake= Your bodyweight in kg x 1.2-1.6(grams)
Fat Intake= 20-30% of your total calories
Carbohydrates= Total calories- (calories from fat+ Calories from Protein)
Again, this division can vary from individual to individual.
References
Gardner CD, et al. Effect of Low-Fat vs. Low-Carbohydrate Diet on 12-Month Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Association With Genotype Pattern or Insulin Secretion: The DIETFITS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. (2018)
Jensen MD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. (2014)
Blackburn GL, Phillips JCC, Morreale S. Physician’s guide to popular low-carbohydrate weight-loss diets. Cleve Clin J Med 2001;68:761, 765-6, 768
Hernandez, T. L., Sutherland, J. P., Wolfe, P., Allian-Sauer, M., Capell, W. H., Talley, N. D., Wyatt, H. R., Foster, G. D., Hill, J. O., & Eckel, R. H. (2010). Lack of suppression of circulating free fatty acids and hypercholesterolemia during weight loss on a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 91(3), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.27909
Guldbrand, H., Dizdar, B., Bunjaku, B. et al. In type 2 diabetes, randomization to advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet transiently improves glycaemic control compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet producing a similar weight loss. Diabetologia 55, 2118–2127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2567-4